Garden Tractor Forums banner

Which small engine would you rather work on, Tecumseh, Wisconsin, Onan, or Briggs?

3.7K views 11 replies 10 participants last post by  tranders  
#1 ·
I haven't had much experience with different older small engines. I have torn down the Wisconsin that is in my dad's Bolens 1053 but it wasn't a complete tear down. It didn't go too bad, I wasn't fond on the carburetor on it.

I was curious to see what some of the more experienced members opinions were.
 
#3 ·
I am going to get to find out what it is like to tear down a Tecumseh this spring or summer. My 12 is due for a rebuild. Motor wise the Wisconsin on dad's bolens was pretty easy to work on but like I said the Zenith carb was a pain. If the previous owner wouldn't have booger-ed it up it probably wouldn't have been that bad.
 
#4 ·
Wisconsin is an easy engine to work on. TEC HH engines are easy enough to work on too. Onan engines have a lot of parts, but aren't too bad, but much more involved than any single. Onan's are easier to work on than any make twin that the block splits down the middle. Onan's main block is a single part.
 
#6 ·
Maybe it's because I've worked on so many that it's second nature. I think they're pretty simple compared to even the Kohlers and Tecumsehs (not that they're rocket science either). But, simplicity comes with a lack of quality in most cases also. Just my 2 cents.
 
#9 ·
Thinking about it now, Honda is about the only big name small engine I haven't gotten into before. Out of any of the ones I have torn apart, my favorites are the small cast iron singles from Briggs. The 5 and 6 S engines in particular for their simplicity and ease of tuning.